Federal Patent Court | Patentrechtler.com - Protection of intellectual property

30. August 2022

My invention. my patent. Is that correct?

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Dringlichkeit, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, einstweilige Verfügung, inventive, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Utility model, Designs, industrial applicability, Annual fee, Newness, action for annulment, Nullity dispute, Invalidity proceedings, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan, PCT procedure, Technizität Tag Registration fees, Anmeldeverfahren, Inventions, new invention, patentrag, patent, Patentanwälte, Patent, patent holder, research

It's that easy to become a patent owner? You have invented something and you are safe, already "unofficial patentee" to be. Nun, unfortunately it's not that simple. Follow us and learn…

28. July 2022

Technical inventions and the FORD case

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, Design, Design Application, Designverletzung, DPMA, Dringlichkeit, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, Inventors, inventive, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Patent, patentable, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan Tag attacked patents, advisory, Inventions, fall, Ford, Fees, law, laws, Hanover, horak, horak Rechtsanwälte, IT, License, patent, Patent Advice, Patent, Patent law, Patgan, technical invention, verdict, judge

Technical inventions must be patented? Naturally! The constant further development of science and technology continuously changes the frontiers of patent protection. A technical invention is not defined in the Patent Act, since the core meaning…

1. July 2022

Patent protection and Covid vaccinations

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, Federal Plant Variety Protection Office, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan Tag lawyers, corona vaccination, Fee, horak, IP law, criticism, patent, Patent Application, Claim, patent use, Patent protection, Patent Protection Vaccination, Attorney, Risk, injury, advantages

Patent protection for Covid vaccines is being relaxed: Consequences of patent law Pharmaceutical manufacturers in developing countries can therefore more easily use the patented technology of companies like Biontech, to produce their own corona vaccinations. Countries like South Africa and…

2. May 2022

Patent infringement: and now?

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Federal Plant Variety Protection Office, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement Tag Expectations, Application for confiscation, federal patent court, dpa, Blog, einstweilige Verfügung, initial consultation, complain, land ring, nine months, action for annulment, Patent infringement

Patent infringement: and now? If you are a patent owner, It is forbidden for other people to make or offer your invention without your consent and you should defend yourself and your patent. Important is,…

8. April 2022

Action for annulment against a patent

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, action for annulment, Patent, Patent Application, Patent, Blog, Patent revocation, Patgan Tag challenged patent, executability, Opposition, lack of patentability, action for annulment, invalid extension, widerrechtliche Entnahme

More than nine months have passed since the publication of the patent, which is to be contested and no opposition proceedings are pending, can be according to § 81 Abs. 2 PatG action for annulment at…

26. January 2022

BGH judgment of 04.08.2020 – X ZR 40/18: Admissibility of the cross-appeal according to § 115 Abs. 2 Set 2 Patgan

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Federal Plant Variety Protection Office, Dringlichkeit, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, Inventors, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection Tag impugned patent, Antrag, appeals process, BGH, electrical power supply system, European patent, Klageanträge, plaintiff, Klägerin, Patent revocation, Patgan, regulations, senate chairperson, verdict, Verfahren, Code of Civil Procedure

employees, employees, employees, employees…

2. March 2015

Explains Nespresso patent for a device for extracting a cartridge and corresponding coffee machines void

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, Patent, Patent Application, Patent, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Patent infringement Tag 2 Ni 6/13 (EP), Nespresso, Patent revocation, Patent Procedure

The dispute over the successful Nespresso machines, the capsules (whether original or not) and the related patents by Nestle go unchanged. In addition to the nullity proceedings, there are also some patent infringement proceedings…

2. February 2015

Explains Supplementary protection certificate for mini-pill "Cerazette" void

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, supplementary protection certificate, Patent Application, Claim, Patent decisions, Patent revocation Tag Ceracette, DE 19975011, supplementary protection certificate, Mini Pill, MSD US, void, ratiopharm

On 6. More 2014 had the 3. Senate of the Federal Patent Court on an appeal ratiopharm GmbH against the supplementary protection certificate EN 199 75 011 MSD Oss B.V. (Netherlands) zu…

23. September 2014

The Technical Board of the Senate of the Patent Court has required for the evaluation of each of the material questions technical expertise

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Patent, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent decisions, Patent, § 100 Patgan, § 26 Patgan, § 65 Patgan Tag Patent Application, Patent Requirements, Expertise, technical board of appeal

a) It is generally assumed, that the Technical Board of the Senate of the Patent Court on the technical fields, falling within its jurisdiction, due to the requirements, bringing the law to the professional…

25. October 2013

Voice output of a navigation instruction, To take account of street names, concerns the content of the reproduced information and is excluded as such from patentability

By horak Rechtsanwälte inArt 52 Abs 2 EPÜ, Art 56 EPÜ, Federal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, inventive, European patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Patent Law, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Patent dispute, technical teaching, Technizität Tag ART 52 EPÜ, European patent, Information, Navigation system, Patent revocation, Software, Software Patent, US-Patent

The instruction to the expert, certain when spoken of a navigation InDIcaToR under certain conditions detailed information (here: Street names) considered, relates to the content of the visual or audible information displayed by the navigation system…

16. October 2013

Apples “Portable electronic device for photo management "was declared in both the members version and in the version of the eight auxiliary requests for void, after Motorola Mobility Germany GmbH and Samsung Electronics GmbH against the European Patent 2 059 868 PREVAIL

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, DPMA, inventive, European Patent Office (EPA), industrial applicability, Newness, Patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Patent decisions, patentable, Patent Law, Patent revocation, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Technizität Tag impugned patent, Apple-Patent, EP 2059868, Photo management, Motorola, Emptiness, Claim 1, Patent dispute, Patent dispute, Patent Procedure, Samsung

Apples "Portable electronic device for photo management "was declared in both the members version and in the version of the eight auxiliary requests for void, employees…

16. May 2013

New registrations of: Warning system, Coupling device, Feed roll, Oil sight glass, Car lock

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, DPMA, Utility model, Gebrauchsmustergesetz Tag attorney, GBM, Utility model, Utility model application, Utility model claim, Utility model description, Utility model registration, Utility Model Law, Gebrauchsmusterrechtler, Utility model protection, Utility model certificate, Grbauchsmusteranwalt, Protection claims, Representatives

No. Selection File number Protection type Designation 1 20 2004 021 941.7 Utility model Selectable eccentric remodeling and/or ablation of atherosclerotic material 2 20 2004 021 942.5 Utility model Selectable eccentric remodeling and/or ablation…

7. November 2012

Figures or drawings, but patents do not disclose the exact mass of the device (BGH)

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, industrial applicability, Patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Patent revocation, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements Tag Dimensions, attorney, Specialist firm, Figures, Revelation, Disclosure, patent, Drawing

Schematic representations, as they are commonly found in patent documents, usually reveal only the principle of the claimed device, but not exact dimensions. A court is not generally held,…

6. November 2012

Slogan “From records are facts” for including computer software keeps the Federal Patent Court incapable of protection; but appeal is approved

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, Brand, Slogan Tag From records are facts, BGH, BPatG, trademark registration, Trademark Attorney, TRADEMARK, Appeal, incapable of protection

The Wortfolge "From records are facts" for goods and services "Computer Software (saved), especially for contract management; Management consultancy (Advice in introduction, Configuration, Operation); Computer consulting (Advice on technical problems…

1. November 2012

Warning Offered, Payment requests and invoices relating to patent applications and renewals

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, supplementary protection certificate, European Patent Office (EPA), Community plant variety rights, Designs, Brand, Supreme Court (AT), Patent, Patent decisions, Patent, Patent revocation, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Plant Variety Protection, Topography protection Tag Fee payment, patent, Patent Application, Patent Attorney, Attorney, extension, Publication, cash

The German patent- and Trademark Office warns in connection with patent applications and renewals - partially misleading - Offered, Payment requests and invoices, are not the German Patent- and Trademark Office come. employees…

31. October 2012

MPEG-2 video signal encoding Patent: Video images can be regarded as a sequence of video image data as a result of a manufacturing process and thus product protection under § 9 Set 2 No.. 3 Enjoy the Patent Law

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, inventive, industrial applicability, Newness, Patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Technizität Tag BGH, Date Strom, DVD-Patent, Invention, Product patent, MPEG-2, MPEG encoding Patent, Patent, patentable, Process patent, Video images

a) A video images representing sequence of video image data can be regarded as indirect pre imme result of a manufacturing process and as such Ches product protection under § 9 Set 2 No.. 3 Enjoy the Patent Law. b) is…

30. October 2012

Warning of payment requests relating to patent applications

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, European Patent Office (EPA), Community plant variety rights, Brand, Patent Tag attorney, fraud, DPMA, Attorney, trademark registration, trademark law, Patent Application, Patent protection, extension, cash, prompt payment

7. June 2012

Software Patent: Urteil BGH X ZR 121/09 – Web page display (it is sufficient for the technicality, when it results from the description)

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, Patent, Patent applications, Patent decisions, Patent, Software Patent, Technizität Tag attorney, Patent for website display, Patent law, Patntierung, Software Patent, Website patent

a) For inventions related to devices and methods (Programs) of electronic data processing is necessary first to ascertain, if the subject matter of the invention is at least to a partial aspect of the technical field…

29. July 2011

Software patent protection is always easier: Urteil BGH X ZR 121/09 from 24. February 2011 – Web page display

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, Patent, Patent applications, Patent revocation, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Technizität Tag Clientpatent, Patent Application, Patent protection, Serverpatent, Software als solche, Software-Patente, Software Patent, Website Software

As such software as such is excluded from patent protection in Germany. With the new Supreme Court ruling now is enough in the case of obvious software patents, that any device (z.B. ein Client) physically through…

17. November 2010

BPatG not 6 The (pat) 312/07 DE is 198 46 442 protectable

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court Tag attorney, patent, patent reviewer, patent registrations

BPatG 6 The (pat) 312/07 DE 198 46 442 protectable In the opposition case concerning the patent 198 46 442 … - 2 - has 6. Senate (Technical board of appeal) des…

Patentrechtler.com – Protection of intellectual property

Category Federal Patent Court