Patentrechtler.com – Protection of intellectual property

Patent Application, Patent protection, Patent infringement, Patent law, Patent Attorney, Attorney, Utility model, Utility model protection, Large belly pattern application, Opposition, Invalidity proceedings, EU-Patent, PCT-Patent, European Patent Application, EP-Patent, International Patents

Category European patent

30. August 2022

My invention. my patent. Is that correct?

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Dringlichkeit, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, einstweilige Verfügung, inventive, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Utility model, Designs, industrial applicability, Annual fee, Newness, action for annulment, Nullity dispute, Invalidity proceedings, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan, PCT procedure, Technizität Tag Registration fees, Anmeldeverfahren, Inventions, new invention, patentrag, patent, Patentanwälte, Patent, patent holder, research

It's that easy to become a patent owner? You have invented something and you are safe, already "unofficial patentee" to be. Nun, unfortunately it's not that simple. Follow us and learn…

Technical inventions and the FORD case

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, Design, Design Application, Designverletzung, DPMA, Dringlichkeit, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, Inventors, inventive, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Patent, patentable, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan Tag attacked patents, advisory, Inventions, fall, Ford, Fees, law, laws, Hanover, horak, horak Rechtsanwälte, IT, License, patent, Patent Advice, Patent, Patent law, Patgan, technical invention, verdict, judge

Technical inventions must be patented? Naturally! The constant further development of science and technology continuously changes the frontiers of patent protection. A technical invention is not defined in the Patent Act, since the core meaning…

1. July 2022

Patent protection and Covid vaccinations

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, Federal Plant Variety Protection Office, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan Tag lawyers, corona vaccination, Fee, horak, IP law, criticism, patent, Patent Application, Claim, patent use, Patent protection, Patent Protection Vaccination, Attorney, Risk, injury, advantages

Patent protection for Covid vaccines is being relaxed: Consequences of patent law Pharmaceutical manufacturers in developing countries can therefore more easily use the patented technology of companies like Biontech, to produce their own corona vaccinations. Countries like South Africa and…

26. January 2022

BGH judgment of 04.08.2020 – X ZR 40/18: Admissibility of the cross-appeal according to § 115 Abs. 2 Set 2 Patgan

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Federal Plant Variety Protection Office, Dringlichkeit, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, Inventors, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection Tag impugned patent, Antrag, appeals process, BGH, electrical power supply system, European patent, Klageanträge, plaintiff, Klägerin, Patent revocation, Patgan, regulations, senate chairperson, verdict, Verfahren, Code of Civil Procedure

employees, employees, employees, employees…

15. October 2015

Patentnichtigkeit des Apple-Patents betreffend die Entsperrung durch Wischen von Motorola durchgesetzt

By horak Rechtsanwälte inArt 52 Abs 2 EPÜ, Art 56 EPÜ, inventive, European patent, Newness, Invalidity proceedings, Claim, Patent Attorney, patentable, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements, Technizität Tag Apple, Apple-Patent, EU Patent Application, EU patent law, Motorola, Patent Attorney, Patent revocation, Patent law

a) Bei der Prüfung der erfinderischen Tätigkeit bleiben Anweisungen, die die Vermittlung bestimmter Inhalte betreffen und damit darauf zielen, auf die menschliche Vorstellung oder Verstandesfähigkeit einzuwirken, as such disregarded.…

IPCOM fails before LG Mannheim against APPLE with its partial claim over a billion damages for patent infringement of a European patent EP 1 841 268

By horak Rechtsanwälte inDPMA, EP 1841 268, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), LG Mannheim, Patent litigation, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Damages, Patent dispute Tag Apple, DE 19910239, EP 1841268, IPCOM, Klageanträge, Patent infringement, Damages

IPCOM ./. Apple (2 The 53/12 and 2 The 95/13) On 11. February 2014 was before the District Court of Mannheim before 2. employees…

11. November 2013

Law Amending patent laws and other legal regulations of intellectual property rights optimized from DPMA procedures 1.4.2014

By horak Rechtsanwälte inDPMA, European patent, Patent, Patent Office Tag DPMA, electronic design application, electronic trademark application, Utility records online, Online Schutzrechtsanmelung, Patent Act online, Extended research report

Munich. The Law on the amendment of patent law provisions and other laws of intellectual property rights was announced today (Gazette. I S. 3830). By law, the procedures are to the German Patent- and…

25. October 2013

Voice output of a navigation instruction, To take account of street names, concerns the content of the reproduced information and is excluded as such from patentability

By horak Rechtsanwälte inArt 52 Abs 2 EPÜ, Art 56 EPÜ, Federal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, inventive, European patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Patent Law, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Patent dispute, technical teaching, Technizität Tag ART 52 EPÜ, European patent, Information, Navigation system, Patent revocation, Software, Software Patent, US-Patent

The instruction to the expert, certain when spoken of a navigation InDIcaToR under certain conditions detailed information (here: Street names) considered, relates to the content of the visual or audible information displayed by the navigation system…