Patent litigation | Patentrechtler.com - Protection of intellectual property

27. October 2023

When does a patent infringement occur??

By horak Rechtsanwälte inComplaints Patent, Patent, Patent Application, Patent law, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement, Scope of protection of a patent, omission Tag Warning, DPMA, EPA, License, Patent violated, Damages, omission

In Germany, patent infringement occurs under certain conditions. Here are the basic conditions: Existing patent: First, a valid patent must exist, which gives the owner certain exclusive rights to a…

30. August 2022

My invention. my patent. Is that correct?

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Dringlichkeit, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, einstweilige Verfügung, inventive, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Utility model, Designs, industrial applicability, Annual fee, Newness, action for annulment, Nullity dispute, Invalidity proceedings, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan, PCT procedure, Technizität Tag Registration fees, Anmeldeverfahren, Inventions, new invention, patentrag, patent, Patentanwälte, Patent, patent holder, research

It's that easy to become a patent owner? You have invented something and you are safe, already "unofficial patentee" to be. Nun, unfortunately it's not that simple. Follow us and learn…

1. July 2022

Patent protection and Covid vaccinations

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, Federal Plant Variety Protection Office, Unified Patent Court, Unit Patent, Blog, Opposition, supplementary protection certificate, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Form-Patent, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent ambush, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan Tag lawyers, corona vaccination, Fee, horak, IP law, criticism, patent, Patent Application, Claim, patent use, Patent protection, Patent Protection Vaccination, Attorney, Risk, injury, advantages

Patent protection for Covid vaccines is being relaxed: Consequences of patent law Pharmaceutical manufacturers in developing countries can therefore more easily use the patented technology of companies like Biontech, to produce their own corona vaccinations. Countries like South Africa and…

2. May 2022

Patent infringement: and now?

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Federal Patent Court, Federal Plant Variety Protection Office, European Patent Office (EPA), European Patent Court, Patent, Patent Office, Patent Application Process, Patent Application, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent decisions, Patent, Blog, Patent fee, Patent Law, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Infringer, Patent infringement Tag Expectations, Application for confiscation, federal patent court, dpa, Blog, einstweilige Verfügung, initial consultation, complain, land ring, nine months, action for annulment, Patent infringement

Patent infringement: and now? If you are a patent owner, It is forbidden for other people to make or offer your invention without your consent and you should defend yourself and your patent. Important is,…

8. January 2020

Indirect incorporeal patent infringement

By horak Rechtsanwälte inEPÜ, inventive, LG Munich, patent infringement, Newness, Invalidity proceedings, Patent, Claim, Patent revocation, Patent litigation, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Patgan, § 10 Patgan Tag suspension, notification, user input, Invention, professional, communication session, Newness, action for annulment, patent, Claim, Patent infringement, claim for damages, Software, storage device, Verfahren

Contributory Patent Infringement- User interface for messaging applications 1. Means within the meaning of § 10 Abs. 1 PatG can also be non-physical objects, a limitation to physical objects is not justified. (Anders…

12. September 2017

Ein Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Verfügung in Patentsachen muss erst zu einem Zeitpunkt angebracht werden, in welchem sowohl die Verletzungs- als auch die Rechtsbestandsfrage hinreichend geklärt sind

By horak Rechtsanwälte inDringlichkeit, Invalidity proceedings, Patent Application, Claim, Patent revocation, Patent litigation, Patent infringement Tag Beschwerdeverfahren, Opposition, EPA, fehlende Dringlichkeit, Patentnichtigkeitsverfahren, Patent infringement

Die Verfügungsklägerin durfte den Verfügungsantrag nach Verkündung der Entscheidung der Technischen Beschwerdekammer des EPA vom 01.06.2016 nicht bis zur Veröffentlichung der Gründe zurückstellen. However, the applicant must first submit the request for injunction…

21. August 2017

Wilkinson darf keine Rasierklingeneinheiten für Nassrasierer vertreiben, die auf den Nassrasierer “Gillette Mach 3” von Gillette passen (Patent infringement).

By horak Rechtsanwälte ineinstweilige Verfügung, LG Düsseldorf, Patent litigation, Patent infringement Tag einstweilige Verfügung, EP 1695800, Gilette, Mach 3, Patent Attorney, Patent law, Patent protection, Patent infringement, Wilkensen

Die Rasierklingeneinheit des Nassrasieres "Gillette Mach" may not be imitated By judgment of 18. July 2017 (4O 66/17) has the 4a patent chamber of the District Court of Düsseldorf of Wilkinson Sword GmbH im…

14. November 2016

Einem übergangenen Miterfinder steht ein Schadensersatzanspruch zu, der auch einen Ausgleich für vom Anmelder gezogene Gebrauchsvorteile umfassen kann

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, LG Munich, Miterfinder, OLG München, Patent Application, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent litigation, Damages, § 6 Patgan, § 744 BGB Tag Bruchteilsgemeinschaft, Erfindergemeinschaft, Invention, mehrere Erfinder, Patent Application, übergangener Miterfinder

Stehen Miterfindern die Rechte an der Erfindung in Bruchteilsgemeinschaft zu, ist die Anmeldung zum Patent durch einen Miterfinder jedenfalls dann nicht als notwendige Maßnahme zur Erhaltung des Gegenstands gerechtfertigt, when…

17. May 2016

Der gesetzliche Vertreter einer Gesellschaft, die ein patentverletzendes Erzeugnis herstellt, ist dem Verletzten zum Schadensersatz verpflichtet, wenn er die ihm möglichen und zumutbaren Maßnahmen unterlässt, die Geschäftstätigkeit des Unternehmens so einzurichten und zu steuern, dass hierdurch keine technischen Schutzrechte Dritter verletzt werden

By horak Rechtsanwälte inArt. 69 EPÜ, Patent, Claim, Patent decisions, Patent Law, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Patent infringement, § 14 Patgan Tag Warning, management liability, legal representatives, Glasfasern II, Liability, Patent infringement, technical property rights, distribution

a) Ein Unternehmen, das ein Produkt, dessen Vertrieb für einen bestimmten Verwendungszweck nur unter bestimmten, dem Schutz der Gesundheit dienenden Voraussetzungen rechtlich zulässig ist, offers for this purpose or in…

15. October 2015

Patentnichtigkeit des Apple-Patents betreffend die Entsperrung durch Wischen von Motorola durchgesetzt

By horak Rechtsanwälte inArt 52 Abs 2 EPÜ, Art 56 EPÜ, inventive, European patent, Newness, Invalidity proceedings, Claim, Patent Attorney, patentable, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements, Technizität Tag Apple, Apple-Patent, EU Patent Application, EU patent law, Motorola, Patent Attorney, Patent revocation, Patent law

a) Bei der Prüfung der erfinderischen Tätigkeit bleiben Anweisungen, die die Vermittlung bestimmter Inhalte betreffen und damit darauf zielen, auf die menschliche Vorstellung oder Verstandesfähigkeit einzuwirken, as such disregarded.…

2. March 2015

Explains Nespresso patent for a device for extracting a cartridge and corresponding coffee machines void

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, Patent, Patent Application, Patent, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Patent infringement Tag 2 Ni 6/13 (EP), Nespresso, Patent revocation, Patent Procedure

The dispute over the successful Nespresso machines, the capsules (whether original or not) and the related patents by Nestle go unchanged. In addition to the nullity proceedings, there are also some patent infringement proceedings…

1. March 2014

IPCOM fails before LG Mannheim against APPLE with its partial claim over a billion damages for patent infringement of a European patent EP 1 841 268

By horak Rechtsanwälte inDPMA, EP 1841 268, European patent, European Patent Office (EPA), LG Mannheim, Patent litigation, Patent infringement, Patent Requirements, Damages, Patent dispute Tag Apple, DE 19910239, EP 1841268, IPCOM, Klageanträge, Patent infringement, Damages

IPCOM ./. Apple (2 The 53/12 and 2 The 95/13) On 11. February 2014 was before the District Court of Mannheim before 2. employees…

21. January 2014

OLG Dusseldorf has set up another Senate with a special jurisdiction for patent litigation

By horak Rechtsanwälte inLG Düsseldorf, OLG Dusseldorf, Patent decisions, Patent litigation Tag Dr Thomas Kühnen, international patent contention-, LG Düsseldorf, OLG Dusseldorf, Patent Chamber, Patentrechtsexperte, Patentsache, Patentsenat, Patent dispute, Ulrike Voss

The Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf has as part of the allocation for the year 2014 set up another Senate with a special jurisdiction for patent litigation. Thus, in addition to being headed by the Chairman…

1. November 2013

The share of the infringer to be issued shall be determined afterwards, whether benefits for the customers of the infringer had seen or proved against them advertising

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Patent, Patent applications, Claim, Patent decisions, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Patent infringement, Damages, Patent dispute, Infringer, § 139 Abs 2 Patgan Tag Cable Lock, Cable lock bracket, Damages, Infringer, Advertise with patented article by infringer, § 139 Patgan

In determining the percentage of the infringer to be issued, has been imparted by the use of the teaching of the invention, regularly is also to be considered, whether and to what extent the inventive design or…

25. October 2013

Voice output of a navigation instruction, To take account of street names, concerns the content of the reproduced information and is excluded as such from patentability

By horak Rechtsanwälte inArt 52 Abs 2 EPÜ, Art 56 EPÜ, Federal, Federal Patent Court, DPMA, inventive, European patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Claim, Patent Attorney, Patent decisions, Patent, patentable, Patent Law, Patent revocation, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Patent dispute, technical teaching, Technizität Tag ART 52 EPÜ, European patent, Information, Navigation system, Patent revocation, Software, Software Patent, US-Patent

The instruction to the expert, certain when spoken of a navigation InDIcaToR under certain conditions detailed information (here: Street names) considered, relates to the content of the visual or audible information displayed by the navigation system…

16. October 2013

Apples “Portable electronic device for photo management "was declared in both the members version and in the version of the eight auxiliary requests for void, after Motorola Mobility Germany GmbH and Samsung Electronics GmbH against the European Patent 2 059 868 PREVAIL

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal Patent Court, DPMA, inventive, European Patent Office (EPA), industrial applicability, Newness, Patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Patent decisions, patentable, Patent Law, Patent revocation, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements, Software Patent, Technizität Tag impugned patent, Apple-Patent, EP 2059868, Photo management, Motorola, Emptiness, Claim 1, Patent dispute, Patent dispute, Patent Procedure, Samsung

Apples "Portable electronic device for photo management "was declared in both the members version and in the version of the eight auxiliary requests for void, employees…

14. October 2013

Nullity dispute uniform even when multiple plaintiffs, applicable within the scope of the same attack – 20 to 30 Million EUR in the specific case

By horak Rechtsanwälte inDPMA, Nullity dispute, Patent, Patent applications, Patent decisions, Patent, Patent revocation, Patent litigation, Patent Requirements Tag multiple claimants, Nullity dispute, Patent revocation, Attorney, RVG, Dispute

If the patent by several plaintiffs attacked to the same extent, is for an allocation of the amount in dispute to the individual lawsuits and a separate value assessment for the value of the object…

9. May 2013

Fees are also complaints grds. Patent litigation, unless, it does not depend on the understanding of the invention

By horak Rechtsanwälte inFederal, Patent, Patent Office, Patent applications, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent litigation Tag Invention, Agency, patent, Patent Attorney Fees, Patent protection, Patent litigation, Attorney fees, Expertise

a) For the fee of a law suit- or patent attorney, it is not necessarily a matter of patent litigation, because the subject matter of the underlying contract related to an invention…

Patentrechtler.com – Protection of intellectual property

Category Patent litigation