When does a technically modified product infringe a patent?, although it does not literally implement all patent features? The Düsseldorf local chamber of the Unified Patent Court dealt with this question (EPG) in their decision…
Patent infringement: and now?
Patent infringement: and now? If you are a patent owner, It is forbidden for other people to make or offer your invention without your consent and you should defend yourself and your patent. Important is,…
Indirect incorporeal patent infringement
The Munich I Regional Court issued a judgment dated: 5. December 2019 (7 The 5314/18) decided, that software is also a “means” in the sense of indirect patent infringement according to § 10 be PatG…
OLG Dusseldorf, I-15 U 4/17: Urgency of the preliminary injunction in patent cases
The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court ruled in its judgment of 29. June 2017 (I-15 U 4/17 – “vacuum-assisted treatment system”) an injunction from a patent was lifted, because the applicant had waited too long.…
Wilkinson darf keine Rasierklingeneinheiten für Nassrasierer vertreiben, die auf den Nassrasierer “Gillette Mach 3” von Gillette passen (Patent infringement).
Die Rasierklingeneinheit des Nassrasieres "Gillette Mach" may not be imitated By judgment of 18. July 2017 (4O 66/17) has the 4a patent chamber of the District Court of Düsseldorf of Wilkinson Sword GmbH im…
Der gesetzliche Vertreter einer Gesellschaft, die ein patentverletzendes Erzeugnis herstellt, ist dem Verletzten zum Schadensersatz verpflichtet, wenn er die ihm möglichen und zumutbaren Maßnahmen unterlässt, die Geschäftstätigkeit des Unternehmens so einzurichten und zu steuern, dass hierdurch keine technischen Schutzrechte Dritter verletzt werden
a) Ein Unternehmen, das ein Produkt, dessen Vertrieb für einen bestimmten Verwendungszweck nur unter bestimmten, dem Schutz der Gesundheit dienenden Voraussetzungen rechtlich zulässig ist, offers for this purpose or in…
IPCOM fails before LG Mannheim against APPLE with its partial claim over a billion damages for patent infringement of a European patent EP 1 841 268
IPCOM ./. Apple (2 The 53/12 and 2 The 95/13) On 11. February 2014 was before the District Court of Mannheim before 2. employees…
Competition capsules for Nespresso coffee machines 0,29 Cent (instead 0,39 Cent) is no patent infringement, because the capsules are not covered by patent protection
According to the press release of the OLG Dusseldorf shown below the competition capsules for Nespresso machines are for 0,29 Cent (instead 0,39 Cent) no patent infringement, because the capsules are not covered by patent protection and…