Category licenses & Employee inventions

BGH, FRAND objection II (KZR 35/17): Willingness to license must continue

The Cartel Senate of the Federal Court of Justice ruled in its judgment of 24. November 2020 (KZR 35/17 – “FRAND Objection II”) continued its jurisprudence on the FRAND objection. The focus is, that willingness to license is not just lip service,…

Read More

BGH, FRAND objection (KZR 36/17): License readiness and obligations of the SEP holder

The Cartel Senate of the Federal Court of Justice ruled in its judgment of 5. More 2020 (KZR 36/17 – “FRAND objection”) the requirements for the antitrust compulsory licensing objection for standard-essential patents (Sep) specified. The patent holder became the…

Read More

Einem übergangenen Miterfinder steht ein Schadensersatzanspruch zu, der auch einen Ausgleich für vom Anmelder gezogene Gebrauchsvorteile umfassen kann

The Federal Court of Justice has ruled in its judgment of 27. September 2016 (X ZR 163/12 – “Coating process”) decided, that a co-inventor may not apply for a patent for the joint invention in his own name alone…

Read More

Proudly powered by WordPress | Blog: Stacy by SpiceThemes