The Federal Court of Justice has ruled in its judgment of 25. August 2015 (X ZR 110/13 – “Unlock image”) the annulment of the German part of the European patent 1 964 022 bestätigt. The patent was about that…
Explains Nespresso patent for a device for extracting a cartridge and corresponding coffee machines void
The dispute over the successful Nespresso machines, the capsules (whether original or not) and the related patents by Nestle go unchanged. In addition to the nullity proceedings, there are also some patent infringement proceedings…
Explains Supplementary protection certificate for mini-pill "Cerazette" void
The Federal Patent Court ruled in its judgment of 6. More 2014 (3 NI 21/12) The SPC DE 199 75 011 for the active ingredient desogestrel – active ingredient under the brand “Cerazette”…
BGH X ZB 19/12 – Communication router: Expertise of the Technical Complaints Senate
The Federal Court of Justice has decided by decision of 26. August 2014 (X ZB 19/12 – "Communication router") decided, that the Technical Appeals Senate of the Federal Patent Court generally has the necessary technical expertise and a…
If a word mark such uses, that the sign is designed graphically or color or pictorial elements are added, for examining the genuine use in accordance with § 26 Abs. 3 MarkenG significantly, whether these additional elements refer to the trade mark as an indication of origin or are merely general statements of fact or advertising highlighting means
If a word mark such uses, that the sign is designed graphically or color or pictorial elements are added, for examining the genuine use in accordance with § 26 Abs. 3…
BGH X ZB 18/12 – „Fond Memories“: Novelty in plant variety protection must be interpreted in accordance with international law
The Federal Court of Justice has decided by decision of 13. January 2014 (X ZB 18/12) decided on the clematis variety “Fond Memories”., that the novelty rule of § 6 Abs. 1 SortG in accordance with the…
IPCOM fails before LG Mannheim against APPLE with its partial claim over a billion damages for patent infringement of a European patent EP 1 841 268
IPCOM ./. Apple (2 The 53/12 and 2 The 95/13) On 11. February 2014 was before the District Court of Mannheim before 2. employees…
BGH X ZR 130/12 – Kabelschloss: Infringer's profit and visibility of the invention for customers
The Federal Court of Justice has decided by decision of 3. September 2013 (X ZR 130/12 – „Kabelschloss“) a non-admission complaint was rejected and clarified, like the share of the infringer's profits to be released in the event of a patent infringement…
BGH X ZR 27/12 – Vehicle navigation system: Voice output of street names does not constitute an inventive step
The Federal Court of Justice has ruled in its judgment of 23. April 2013 (X ZR 27/12 – “Vehicle navigation system”) the annulment of a European patent for a navigation system was confirmed. The focus is on the question, what characteristics…
Nullity dispute uniform even when multiple plaintiffs, applicable within the scope of the same attack – 20 to 30 Million EUR in the specific case
The Federal Court of Justice has decided by decision of 27. August 2013 (X ZR 83/10 – “Value in dispute II”) decided, that the amount in dispute in a patent nullity action is generally not divided if there are several plaintiffs. Guiding principle will…
BGH X ZB 15/12 – Patentstreitsache II: A patent attorney's fee claim is not simply a patent dispute
The Federal Court of Justice has decided by decision of 20. March 2013 (X ZB 15/12 – „Patentstreitsache II“) decided, when the fee claim of a right- or patent attorney as a patent dispute within the meaning of Section 143…
Competition capsules for Nespresso coffee machines 0,29 Cent (instead 0,39 Cent) is no patent infringement, because the capsules are not covered by patent protection
According to the press release of the OLG Dusseldorf shown below the competition capsules for Nespresso machines are for 0,29 Cent (instead 0,39 Cent) no patent infringement, because the capsules are not covered by patent protection and…
Figures or drawings, but patents do not disclose the exact mass of the device (BGH)
The Federal Court of Justice has decided by decision of 16. October 2012 (X ZB 10/11 – “Plug connection”) clarified, what schematic drawings in a patent specification reveal – and what they do not. Principle Schematic representations, as…
Slogan “From records are facts” for including computer software keeps the Federal Patent Court incapable of protection; but appeal is approved
The Federal Patent Court has decided in its decision of 29. October 2012 (30 The (pat) 40/11) the registration of the slogan “Files become facts” as a trademark for software and consulting services in the area of contract management…
BGH X ZR 33/10 – MPEG-2 video signal encoding: Product protection for encoded video data
The Federal Court of Justice has ruled in its judgment of 21. August 2012 (X ZR 33/10 – “MPEG-2 video signal encoding”) decided, that a sequence of coded video data generated using a patented process is considered a direct product of the process in accordance with §…
For the contestability of a patent license agreement upon withdrawal of the patent application
The Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court (6. civil senate) has with judgment of 11. July 2012 (AZ. 6 U 114/11) decided, that a licensee can challenge a patent license agreement on grounds of fraudulent misrepresentation, if kept secret from him…
BGH X ZR 75/08 – Tire sealant: Novelty and unauthorized extension
The Federal Court of Justice (X. civil senate) has with judgment of 12. July 2011 (AZ. X ZR 75/08 – Tire sealant) the declaration of invalidity of the European patent 0 753 420 bestätigt. The focus is on the…
Software-Patente: BGH X ZR 121/09 from 24. February 2011 - Website display
The Federal Court of Justice (X. civil senate) has with judgment of 24. February 2011 (AZ. X ZR 121/09 - Website display) the invalidation of a German patent on a method for retrieving visited websites was confirmed.…
Licensee has independent right of action: Urteil BGH X ZR 86/10 from 5. April 2011 – RCA plug
The Federal Court of Justice (X. civil senate) has with judgment of 5. April 2011 (AZ. X ZR 86/10 – RCA plug) decided, that a patent holder has his own claims against you despite the granting of an exclusive license…
Remodeling complex device patentable: BGH X ZR 173/07 from 7. September 2010 – Roll stand II
The Federal Court of Justice (X. civil senate) has with judgment of 7. September 2010 (AZ. X ZR 173/07 – Walzgerüst II) the dismissal of an action for invalidity against the European patent 597 265 confirmed and…